Review: Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest

Fire Emblem Conquest Cover

Initial Release Date: February 19, 2016

Developer: Intelligent Systems

Platforms: 3DS (reviewed)

Publisher: Nintendo

Introduction

Fire Emblem, now somewhat a mainstream success, continues the turn-based strategy with Fates, which is further broken into three expansions – Conquest, Birthright, and Revelations.  For this review, I played through Conquest.

Narrative/Story

Fire Emblem Fates is broken into three branching story lines between Conquest, Birthright, and Revelations.  In Conquest, you decide to stick around with your family in Nohr instead of defecting back to your “birth” land.

When you get to the branch in the story, you get a choice based on what games and/or DLC you have loaded onto your system.  Since I only had the physical Conquest cartridge, I only had one choice.

Fire Emblem Conquest Branch

Before this critical branching structure is the build up to said divergence.  Your character is finally freed from his castle isolation by his father, and you meet your siblings and begin to learn their various quirks.  Half the fun of Fire Emblem is triggering the dialogue interactions between the characters.

Things move a lot quicker post-branch choice.  In Conquest, it means coming to terms with choosing to stay with Nohr, which is a bit awkward as they are framed as the villains in Fates.

I don’t want to spoil too much, but the basic gist surrounds the avatar’s inability to reconcile his father’s harshness with his seemingly innate goodness.  While the avatar wants to bring the kingdoms together and forsake war, the Nohrian King wants to annihilate everything in his path.

While it was interesting seeing the story play out from the “evil” side, it did seem a little awkward that the avatar has such a strange relationship with his family.  He seemingly adores his father, whom he has barely met.  His siblings have much better depth, in their parallel struggle to follow the patriarch against their moral inclinations.

Overall, the story’s conclusion was a bit easy to foresee, but did give the player some satisfaction.  While I was not impressed with the overall plot, I enjoyed the characters and watching their interactions.  In the end, I was interested in seeing how things played out in the other games, at least story-wise.

Gameplay

As with the story, Fire Emblem Fates branches into different gameplay styles depending on your choice.  In Conquest, you are stuck with the “traditional” Fire Emblem formula where you move from chapter to chapter, without the ability to grind in between chapters (as opposed to Awakening).

However, in between chapters you are dumped into a castle HQ.  Here, you can run around and interact with your army, collect items, and upgrade your base.  Upgrading your base has multiplayer implications, but also gives access to things like the weapon and armor shops.

Fire Emblem Conquest HQ

Just as in previous titles, your units bond via dialogue, and if they are compatible, they can marry have children.  This is probably the most interesting mechanic for me, as I really like to try and optimize the units, or come up with some interesting combos for strong or unique offspring.

With your units and respective offspring, you enter each chapter battle.  The intro and outro of each of these missions progresses the story before the the actual battling starts.

The battle system is the tried and true grid, turn based battling system we all know and love.  You deploy what units you desire (although sometimes you have to choose certain characters) and move them like chess pieces to achieve whatever the objective is.  If you are new to the series, the basic premise is very similar to Final Fantasy Tactics where you get a turn to move all of your units, and then pass the turn to the AI who counterattacks.  Rinse and repeat.

Fire Emblem Conquest Battle

Weapon counters remain in the game, and some new classes are introduced as well.  Once a unit has gained the requisite experience and level, the can upgrade to their advanced class, just like previous titles.

For some reason, I did not get as engaged in switching up my characters classes back and forth as I did in Awakening.  Perhaps this has to do with the inability to grind in Conquest, but I was disappointed that their was not a larger pool of experience to really develop the full range of units.

Fire Emblem Conquest Cutscene

Overall, the game gave more of the traditional Fire Emblem experience.  The battling is satisfying and devilishly tricky.  Nohr has its own unique classes (as does Hoshido) which add more strategic depth, as you don’t just battle a mirror image of your own army.

While I enjoyed the basic gameplay mechanics, I couldn’t get over a certain lack of excitement I had in Awakening.  Again, I attribute this to possibly favoring the grinding style over the straight story.  While Conquest’s lack of grind increases difficulty, I suppose my enjoyment really stems from grinding my characters into unique killing machines.  Birthright would probably be the best branch for me.

Additional Factors

The graphics are decent enough for what the game needs.  Notably, the characters now have feet, so that anomaly from Awakening has been remedied.  The battles look as good as ever, although I turned them off after awhile as I was tired of seeing the same ones over and over.  The animated cutscenes were superb, and in Conquest really help build up an important moment.

Fire Emblem Conquest Cutscene Dance

Without a true overworld map, I did not get sucked into the world or get a feeling of progression in marching towards the Hoshido capital.  While the base building adds a unique layer to the game, it didn’t add to the atmosphere and I didn’t do too much multiplayer to make it worthwhile.

The expansion angle was, to me, an odd choice.  I understand Pokemon has had success with the formula (as have other titles), but those are very much the same game, but with unique Pokemon per game.  Fire Emblem gives very different experiences in each.

In a way, this is a really good thing – those who prefer one style over another get a choice.  Looking back I really wished I went with Birthright, so I suppose I should have read reviews beforehand.  I really wanted to get the special edition that contains ALL expansions onto one cartridge, but they are hard to find and quite expensive.  Why not make more of these?

Conclusion

Overall Fire Emblem Fates was more turn-based tactics goodness, but failed to reach the hype of Awakening.  Each of the expansions offers a unique way to play through the same story, while also maintaining a depth of customization (although still short of other “Tactics” titles).

The Conquest story was different, and gives a glimpse into the “bad guys” while building interest for the other games.  The presentation is standard for the series, with some voice acting for the litany of dialogue and banter between the characters.

Overall, the game just lacks that little something special.  I put some of this on my choice of expansion, but it was still a nagging factor.  While Fates does a lot of good, it doesn’t reach the level of excellent.

 

The Good

+Branching story and gameplay style

+Tried and true turn-based grid

+Layers of customization with classes and children

The Bad

-Multiple games increases cost

-Conquest lacks ability to grind

 

Total Score: 6.5/10

 

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Review: Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest

  1. I have not played this game. I have always been interested in the Fire Emblem series as, when playing Super Smash Bros Melee, I always thought the Fire Emblem games were just like the Legend of Zelda series. The games seem to be quite interesting, with complex stories and interactions. It is interesting that this game allows the player to join the villains and learn more about their characters and motivations. It seems like this game consists of the player conquering more land to reach the enemy.
    What is grinding? Is there a different ending to this game compared to the original? How are the battles? Are they between small amounts of units? Or between large armies?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Grinding is battling over and over to raise the level or stats of your characters, without advancing the story. The battles are between set amounts of single character units, which I would say are small scale, kinda like chess.

      Like

  2. I waaaant this game. And the rest of the Revelations games. To be honest though, splitting it up into three games has really thrown me off, though. It’s largely that it feels more like a cash grab, than anything else, even though the games do have different contents. Mayhaps if they had spaced the releases out a bit more, might not feel so dirty picking them up.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Or make more of the special edition available! But then I guess it wouldn’t be as much of a collectors item. I’m taking time in between the games to make it feel as though they are spaced out releases. It is nice to get essentially three fire emblems at once.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I liked Conquest better than Birthright. The latter was just too easy, and I am not that good at strategy games. Not only did I think the plot of Conquest was more intriguing, with your avatar fighting for what is the “evil” side, but its missions felt more varied thanks to the range of different goals and engaging because one mistake could be fatal

    Liked by 1 person

    • The stakes were definitely raised without grinding, and I had to quickly decide who I would focus experience on. It was also a good change of pace to be “the bad guys” and seeing how Nohr family justified their actions throughout the war.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I enjoyed Awakening more, due to its fun cast of characters, but I still enjoyed the Fates trilogy. Sounds like you would enjoy Birthright or Revelation more, as you are able to powerlevel your army thanks to optional battles.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Good review! I think Birthright would definitely be more up your alley. I enjoyed Conquest more, but that’s because it did have a difficulty hearkening back to classic Fire Emblem. That’s not everyone’s taste, though neither is grinding. The fact that you enjoy grinding really points to Birthright. Since you’ve played Conquest too, playing through Birthright and then Revelation (which also allows grinding and is even better than the other two) is an option. Splitting up the games was interesting, but it does play to two FE fanbases and I applaud it for doing that,

    Liked by 1 person

    • I definitely like the fact they made the two styles side by side so people could choose. I do agree and think Birthright is probably more to my taste, just because I do enjoy grinding to get an optimal team. Conquest was definitely in the classic style that did add considerable difficulty bc of no grinding.

      Liked by 1 person

Add to the Discussion:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s